Regina Elena, laid down 1901 Length, 145.0 m x Beam, 22.0 m x Depth, 7.9 m 12704 tonnes normal displacement (11095 tonnes standard) Main battery: 4 x 30.5-cm (2 x 2) Secondary battery: 12 x 20.3-cm (6 x 2) QF battery: 16 x 7.6-cm Weight of broadside: 3064 kg 2 TT, 45.0 cm (submerged) Main belt, 25.0 cm; ends unarmored Armor deck, average 3.8 cm Conning tower, 25.0 cm Battery armor: Main, 20.0 cm Maximum speed for 15730 indicated kw = 21.00 knots Approximate cruising radius, 10000 nm / 10 knots Typical complement: 598-778 Estimated cost, $6.086 million (£1.521 million) Remarks: DESIGN FAILURE: Hull cannot carry loads! Relative extent of belt armor, 137 percent of 'typical' coverage. Magazines and engineering spaces are cramped, with poor watertight subdivision. Cramped ship; poor crew accommodation, limited working space. Distribution of weights: Percent normal displacement: Armament ......................... 843 tonnes = 7 pct Armor, total ..................... 3047 tonnes = 24 pct Belt 1822 tonnes = 14 pct Deck 597 tonnes = 5 pct C.T. 116 tonnes = 1 pct Armament 512 tonnes = 4 pct Machinery ........................ 3243 tonnes = 26 pct Hull and fittings; equipment ..... 3097 tonnes = 24 pct Fuel, ammunition, stores ......... 2425 tonnes = 19 pct Miscellaneous weights ............ 50 tonnes = 0 pct ----- 12704 tonnes = 100 pct Estimated metacentric height, 1.5 m Displacement summary: Light ship: 10279 tonnes Standard displacement: 11095 tonnes Normal service: 12704 tonnes Full load: 13940 tonnes Loading submergence 2021 tonnes/metre +++++++++++++++++++++++++ Estimated overall survivability and seakeeping ability: Relative margin of stability: 1.29 Shellfire needed to sink: 1882 kg = 4.8 x 30.5-cm shells (Approximates weight of penetrating shell hits needed to sink ship, not counting critical hits) Torpedoes needed to sink: 1.0 (Approximates number of 'typical' torpedo hits needed to sink ship) Relative steadiness as gun platform, 51 percent (50 percent is 'average') Relative rocking effect from firing to beam, 0.39 Relative quality as a seaboat: 1.01 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ Hull form characteristics: Block coefficient: 0.50 Sharpness coefficient: 0.38 Hull speed coefficient 'M' = 6.23 'Natural speed' for length = 21.8 knots Power going to wave formation at top speed: 46 percent Estimated hull characteristics and strength: Relative underwater volume absorbed by magazines and engineering spaces: 136 percent Relative accommodation and working space: 71 percent Displacement factor: 77 percent (Displacement relative to loading factors) Relative cross-sectional hull strength: 0.69 (Structure weight per square metre of hull surface: 489 kg) Relative longitudinal hull strength: 0.93 (for 3.15 m average freeboard; freeboard adjustment -1.69 m) Relative composite hull strength: 0.71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ [Machine-readable parameters: Spring Style v. 1.2.1] 475.60 x 72.16 x 25.91; 10.33 -- Dimensions 0.50 -- Block coefficient 1901 -- Year laid down 21.00 / 10000 / 10.00; Reciprocating -- Speed / radius / cruise 50 tons -- Miscellaneous weights ++++++++++ 4 x 12.01; 2; 0 -- Main battery; turrets; superfiring : 12 x 7.99; 6 -- Secondary battery; turrets : 16 x 2.99 -- Tertiary (QF/AA) battery : 0 -- No fourth (light) battery 2 / 2 / 17.72 -- TT / submerged / size ++++++++++ 9.84 / 0.00 / 0.00 / 0.00; 137 -- Belt armor; relative extent 1.50 / 9.84 -- Deck / CT 7.87 / 0.00 / 0.00 / 0.00 -- Battery armor (Note: For portability, values are stored in Anglo-American units) +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ elena Regina Elena 145 22 7.9 .5 y 1901 4 30.5 2 0 n 12 20.3 6 16 7.6 0 2 2 45 25 0 0 136.5 0 3.8 25 20 0 0 n 50 z n 21 y 10 z y 10000 3.15 z 50